OpenMotif 2.3 Request for comments

This forum is read only. No new submissions are accepted.

Questions about motif? Contact us

Submitted by Bass on Fri, 06/08/2007 - 09:37.

Hi!

Great news and goog job!
I have a bunch of questions however.

1. Why does the 2.3 tarball contain stale symlinks instead of regular files (i. e. config.sub, config.guess, missing)?

2. Why does the 2.3 tarball contain files which are not under CVS control or those differing from their CVS counterparts? See below:

$ cvs status autogen.sh
===================================================================
File: autogen.sh Status: Locally Modified

Working revision: 1.5
Repository revision: 1.5 /cvs/openmotif/autogen.sh,v
Sticky Tag: HEAD (revision: 1.5)
Sticky Date: (none)
Sticky Options: (none)

Why aren't Makefile.in/Makefile.am put into CVS?

3. Why release_2_3 CVS tag is not yet present?

4. What's the difference between openmotif_2_3 and XFT_BRANCH CVS branches?

Thanks.

Andrew ``Bass'' Shcheglov.

Thu, 07/26/2012 - 12:44
#1
5 posts / 0 new
Last post
25
Thu, 07/26/2012 - 12:45
15
Thu, 07/26/2012 - 12:45
0
Thu, 07/26/2012 - 12:45
-1
Thu, 07/26/2012 - 12:44